Embedded Files
How it Started...
How it Started...
In September 2024, the Council unanimously voted for Ordinance 22-O-1222, which prohibited data centers within 1/2 a mile of MARTA Stations. The following month, developers tried to undermine the new ordinance by getting Councilman Antonio Lewis to propose his own ordinance (Z-24-66) which would have carved out an exception in order to build a data center next to the West End MARTA Station. This would have made the original ordinance essentially meaningless. After all, once it's been shown that an exception can be made, so too can another, and another, and another.
In September 2024, the Council unanimously voted for Ordinance 22-O-1222, which prohibited data centers within 1/2 a mile of MARTA Stations. The following month, developers tried to undermine the new ordinance by getting Councilman Antonio Lewis to propose his own ordinance (Z-24-66) which would have carved out an exception in order to build a data center next to the West End MARTA Station. This would have made the original ordinance essentially meaningless. After all, once it's been shown that an exception can be made, so too can another, and another, and another.
How we responded...
How we responded...
The community wrote letters, signed petitions, and showed up at zoning and city council meetings in force. Our efforts culminated in this letter of support from Mayor Dickens' Office, which resulted in Councilman Lewis withdrawing his proposed ordinance.
The community wrote letters, signed petitions, and showed up at zoning and city council meetings in force. Our efforts culminated in this letter of support from Mayor Dickens' Office, which resulted in Councilman Lewis withdrawing his proposed ordinance.
A note on the opposition...
A note on the opposition...
The developer would like you to believe that he is earnestly seeking consensus with the community, but don't be deceived. There is good reason to believe that he may have compensated dozens of individuals to show up at meetings to support his interests. There's a term for the practice ..."astroturfing", and it basically means giving the false appearance of grassroots support.
The developer would like you to believe that he is earnestly seeking consensus with the community, but don't be deceived. There is good reason to believe that he may have compensated dozens of individuals to show up at meetings to support his interests. There's a term for the practice ..."astroturfing", and it basically means giving the false appearance of grassroots support.
Does that sort of tactic sound like something that anyone who is acting in good faith would do?
Where We Stand...
Where We Stand...
The community is eager to see this property be transformed. The location is perfect for everyone who wants quick stress-free access to all points North and South via MARTA's Gold and Red lines. In addition, the historic charm of the 100+ year-old Ruralist Press Building's stone-facade, which the developer has said is an "eyesore" that he intends to demolish, would serve as a fascinating centerpiece for any residential or mixed-use development.
The community is eager to see this property be transformed. The location is perfect for everyone who wants quick stress-free access to all points North and South via MARTA's Gold and Red lines. In addition, the historic charm of the 100+ year-old Ruralist Press Building's stone-facade, which the developer has said is an "eyesore" that he intends to demolish, would serve as a fascinating centerpiece for any residential or mixed-use development.
Furthermore, with it being nearly certain that The MET, which was recently purchased by Atrium Healthcare, is indeed the site where Atlanta would like to build another hospital (aka "Project Robin"), this property is ideally situated to serve many complementary purposes, including as housing for future hospital personnel who want to walk to work, as well as for shopping and dining opportunities for hospital staff and visitors.
The sky is the limit for this property. And while the owner is quick to state that the property requires environmental remediation, he won't share the details, which means that it's probably not actually bad. Besides, even if the contamination were severe, which it almost certainly isn't, there are many ways to reclaim such properties at little or no cost to developers.
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse